2 
8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
03 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
BEWARE OF SOMETHING-FRIEDMANN.
FAQ 1: Is he a corrupt-or-prosperous politician, who is threatened by Supreme Court?
FAQ 2: Is he a real member of Leftist Branja?
FAQ 3: Is he a real(?) friend of Dorit Beinisch?
FAQ 4: Who are encouraging my open insulting Dorit Beinisch? Beinisch-haters only? Or plus No.1, No.1&2, or even No.1-3? Or the rest of FOLKS, who are not allowed to join No.2? Or EVERYBODY? Dear WordPress, please give me the normal editing tool. Please let me know the truth. Exactly who and how many are visiting my two blogs each day? How come I can receive all these and those mysterious comments from where I don’t allow them? First of all… should I call them comments? Just feel funny.
SO FAR… please check
From Supreme Court after Olmert (Beinisch should get rid of Friedmann as quickly as possible, From Sep 3, 2008 to Present)
No. 1: Ehud Barak (Labor): Friedmann, I don’t need to listen to you any more…
No. 1 or 2 or 3: Shelly Yechimovich (Labor): Lebanon Before Winograd Report (Beinisch Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann)
No. 1 or 2 or 3: Ophir Pines-Paz (Labor): I was against Barak/Liebermann/Bibi (Beinisch Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann)
No. 1 or 2 or 3: Shalom Simhon (Labor): Beinisch’s darling since … (LINK will be added)
No. 1 or 2 or 3: Zehava Galon (Meretz): Please check In sum, I will travel ALL over the world and plead Palestinian Right to Targeted Killing of DORIT BEINISCH (My Knesset mail on Oct 2 – Nov 24, 2008. LINK will soon be added to report this comical big-mouth!)
No. 2 or 3: Dalia Dorner: Former Judge & Israel Press Council’s President (Beinisch Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann)
No. 1 or 3: Dan Meridor (Likud): Please check Phoenix-Bibi
No. 1 or 3: Gideon Saar (Likud): Please check Phoenix-Bibi
No. 1 or 3: Bennie Begin (Likud): LINK will be added.
02 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
From Is “Friedmannism” Good for Israel? (From Aug 13, 2007 to Present)
1. Daniel Friedmann: Everybody has misunderstood me! Saving the High Court from itself. (Aug 23, 2007 to Present)
2. Amnon Rubinstein: Danny acts in good faith. He will do nothing extreme. His remarks were directed against a certain frame of mind in the court. (Mar 8, 2007 to Present)
3. Supreme Court to Yaakov Ne’eman: This dog would not be allowed to leave deep scratches on the furniture. (May 09, 2004 to Present)
4. Professional Jurists say bla-bla-bla…
4-1. Moshe Negbi: Menachem Mautner recommends that judges make efforts to cite principles of halakha and Jewish jurisprudence in their rulings and that the judges recognize Israeli society today as a multicultural one.
4-2. Who will be the next?
01 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Starting from FIFTH OF ALL, in Dear-Arab-Readers
Beinisch Politics has nothing to do with LAW
Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)
P.S.: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)
P.P.S.: Beinisch’s Secret Society Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann
Beinisch: Media to blame for public’s loss of faith in courts (From Jul 21, 2008 to Present).
Supreme Court after Olmert (Beinisch should get rid of Friedmann as quickly as possible, From Sep 3, 2008 to Present)
Is “Friedmannism” Good for Israel? (From Aug 13, 2007 to Present)
Supreme Court Inside/Outside Israel (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
A Purge at Haaretz (Is Haaretz going to become another Bibi-ton? How long will it take? From Aug, 2006 to Present)
Dorit Beinisch toward/during/after Yitzhak Rabin’s Assassination (From Aug, 1993 to Present)
Dorit Beinisch had a story with KACH members! So, this female jurist used Barenboim as a human shield to protect her family!! SIC!!! (This collection is not finished yet)
Please see SECTION on the LEFT
Police-&-Prosecution (It is after Who was busier and poorer? Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann or Attorney General Menachem Mazuz? (Feb 8, 2007 to Present)
Citizenship-Law (It is after Barak, Beinisch, Friedmann & Citizenship Law (From Jul 31. 2003 to Present))
Absentee-Property-Law (It is after Absentee Property Law: Settlers, IDF & State quietly expropriate land (West Bank settlement construction nearly doubled this year, From Aug, 1993 to Present))
WORKING ON THESE, too…
Settlers are above LAW (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
Arab-Jewish Clash (Acre-Riots): 8 years after the October Riots, NOTHING has been done to implement the recommendations of the OR-COMMISSION in regard to Israeli Arabs (From Oct 10, 2008 to Present)
Supreme Court & Palestinians: (It stinks… but I’m still not ready for the collection of articles on these issues.) Last updated on Nov 20, 2008
1 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
03 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
From MARCH 15 – 20, 2009 in Section: Nationalist-Govn’t-Please (Nov 24, 2008 to Present)
BEWARE OF SOMETHING-FRIEDMANN.
FAQ 1: Is he a corrupt-or-prosperous politician, who is threatened by Supreme Court?
FAQ 2: Is he a real member of Leftist Branja?
FAQ 3: Is he a real(?) friend of Dorit Beinisch?
FAQ 4: Who are encouraging my open insulting Dorit Beinisch? Beinisch-haters only? Or plus No.1, No.1&2, or even No.1-3? Or the rest of FOLKS, who are not allowed to join No.2? Or EVERYBODY? Dear WordPress, please give me the normal editing tool. Please let me know the truth. Exactly who and how many are visiting my two blogs each day? How come I can receive all these and those mysterious comments from where I don’t allow them? First of all… should I call them comments? Just feel funny.
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
Meanwhile, I am still trying to figure out the exact identity of Former Meretz’s Leader or PM Barak’s Education Minister under Shas. What is his reason of Anti-Friedmann? His present life as Haaretz’s Journalist tells me that he is NOT a corrupt politician threatened by Supreme Court. This is the guy, after all, who wrote that NO Justice Portfolio is needed in Beinisch’s government.
Yossi Sarid: Birds of a feather July 13, 2008 / By Haaretz
(…) Another prime minister was so opposed to having me serve as education minister in his government that he once offered me the job of justice minister. I refused, so he tried to convince me: The justice minister, he said, doesn’t have a lot to do in his ministry. Most of the work is done by others: the attorney general, the state prosecutor and their employees. At 12 noon you’re free, he promised, and you still have an entire day for your favorite pastimes. (…)
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
Please check
From Friedmannism
From Supreme Court to Yaakov Ne’eman: This dog would not be allowed to leave deep scratches on the furniture.
JIWON: Funny… Whenever I search for more, Beinisch’s friend, EDNA ARBEL, and Beinisch’s husband, YECHEZKEL BEINISCH, appear as HOT potatoes. Who are more mediocre? Dorit Beinisch or her friend or her husband?
Basically, Beinisch’s Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra Scandal was right inbetween several Neeman-keyword-searches in The Branja Conspiracy: The Israeli Elite’s Usurping of Power (Sep, 2004), and I wanted to stop (typing) when the last Neeman-keyword appeared. But I realized that Beinisch’s NILI COHEN affair was such an important scandal in the history of Israeli Supreme Court and EVERYTHING started with this disgusting happening. What a Secret Society. What a Mediocre Society.
FOLKS kept wailing. Labor’s Ehud Barak has been crying.
Editorial: Netanyahu’s bankruptcy Mar 10, 2009 / By Haaretz
(…) Friedmann’s reform initiatives have remained for the most part empty of content, but the fact that he has raised them repeatedly has badly damaged the public image of the justice system, which was and still is the first line of defense of Israeli democracy. (…)
Background: Neeman is no stranger to government service Mar. 15, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) Neeman is seen as willing to carry out reforms within the ministry, but does not have the problematic personal relations with the upper echelons of the justice system that Friedmann has. (…)
Barak: I don’t want to be kicked out of Labor, so JM Friedmann will make a good excuse of my refusal to serve Bibi Mar 8, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
Netanyahu may seek two-week extension Mar 13, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) The meeting came a day after it became clear that Daniel Friedmann would not remain justice minister, which was Labor’s main demand for joining Netanyahu’s government. (…) “Unlike Friedmann, Barak has no problem with Neeman. Bibi hasn’t closed the door on Labor joining the government.” the Barak adviser said. (…) MK Ophir Paz-Pines (Labor) issued a statement saying that even without Friedmann, Netanyahu’s government would be antagonistic to the legal establishment.
(Updated on MARCH 20, 2009)
A series of articles appear… it seems that FOLKS already know what I am supposed to write.
The return of the judicial activism critic Mar 13, 2009 / By Haaretz, Tomer Zarchin
(…) In 2002, Neeman chaired a public commission (…) Basic Law (…) These recommendations were never adopted, but Friedmann recently secured cabinet approval for a similar proposal. Unlike Friedmann, however, Neeman has never expressed a desire to change the composition of the Judicial Appointments Committee. Friedmann wanted to alter the composition to make elected officials a majority of the panel, whereas currently, five of the nine members are unelected legal officials – three Supreme Court justices and two Bar Association representatives.
How many times should I write more… that I am not a part of rebel? I am perhaps the first advocate/devotee of GUILD SYSTEM, which usually dubbed ‘Secret Society’. This is the best way to preserve golden tradition in its purest form, if it sure exists. Thus I am also perhaps the best one to understand reason of furious reaction from the Jewish Branja, who wants to protect Legal Secret Society at any price… in their favorite way.
Here goes my fundamental problem: Why the World of (Israeli) Law needs this kind of Guild System? Law is never like Art or Music.
Whatever… I must tell this. To preserve the golden tradition, the secret society, whatever it is, has to meet a certain criterion. (Does Contributing Editor of Azure call the members Champions? I prefer to call them Beinisch’s puppies, though.)
SELF CRITICISM.
Guess what? I fell in love with the Jewish State the moment when I found this word from Barenboim’s book, in which he boasted that ‘self criticism’ is the most characteristic of being the JEW. (It is among three things; SC, SWC, and Jewish Wit&Wisdom.) Now, I feel lost. Who among all those Jewish pigs around Daniel Barenboim boasts this very Jewish characteristic? Not surprisingly, I find that Dorit Beinisch violated this very rule… in a fundamental way. And then, this female jurist wants to go farther. Farther and farther…
What I feel funny is that it seems that EVERYBODY is encouraging my open insulting Dorit Beinsich while FOLKS are united to blame Prof. Friedmann for causing harm to public’s faith in Israel’s justice system. I know… that there is a difference between my computer work and Prof. Friedmann’s reform. It is NOT that I am NOT a legal expert.
I wrote and wrote… that Israeli justice system is none of my business. EVERYBODY has known that my only concern is the way how Beinisch’s Secret Society has treated my life for more than a decade and all my writings about Dorit Beinisch’s very-professional-LEGAL-life is purely based on this very fact. What fascinates me is that the more time I spend with this keyword, Google: Beinisch + XYZ, the more I realize that the BASIC problem in Israel’s justice system has been ill-qualification of Dorit Beinisch as a Supreme Court President.
THUS all these and those problems could have been solved in the most dramatic and effective way if Dorit Beinisch resigned from her position. Is Aharon Barak’s Israeli justice system, however, willing to allow this in its history? It will only disprove Aharon Barak’s Legacy. What about Dorit Beinisch herself? This aggressive female is very like Waltraud Meier in German Wagner Society. I promise that this Jew will never give up until or even after her female rivals die. She will prefer to work under male junior. If this is inferior, better. If this is from foreign lands, much better.
Below is two different articles by the same author, whose favorite word has been RADICAL.
Evelyn Gordon: Civil Fights: Why High Court’s champions must back Ne’eman Mar 18, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) Though Friedmann outspokenly advocates judicial reform, his two years in office achieved exactly nothing. Not one substantive reform was enacted, and his aggressive, confrontational manner alienated even many supporters. This failure had multiple causes, but foremost was the fact that Friedmann, a brilliant legal scholar, proved a lousy politician. He did not know how to muster support, forge compromises and conduct horse trades to get his proposals passed. (…) SHETREET’S PROPOSALS are actually too moderate. The court, however, refuses to change direction on its own. (…) And ultimately, this is the choice facing the court’s supporters: modest but substantive Shetreet-style reforms now, or far more radical reforms further down the line. (…)
Please check
From Selected Articles 1: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)
No.5 Evelyn Gordon: Judicial power grab May 18, 2006 / By Jerusalem Post
Sunday’s High Court of Justice ruling on the amended Citizenship Law mandates urgent action by the government. (…) Rather, it is reforming the judicial selection process – because without this, the government will be unable to enact any immigration legislation. (…) YET NOW, Barak has declared that the court is even authorized to overrule the “constitution”! Given all this, it is clear that neither immigration restrictions nor any other policy disliked by the justices has any chance of being upheld by the current court. (…) However, this is possible only if the judicial selection process is radically overhauled – because today, the justices essentially select their own replacements, so any new appointees will almost certainly share the current majority’s views. (…) THUS IF the government is to have any hope of enacting immigration reform – or any other policy frowned on by the current justices – it must reform Israel’s judicial selection process to bring it into line with those of other Western democracies. In other democracies, the appointment of justices is left entirely to the executive and legislature; the justices themselves have no say in the matter. And this is essential to maintain a proper balance between the three branches of government. (…) But only by radically reforming the judicial selection system can this imbalance ever be corrected.
This author called Prof. Friedmann a lousy politician. Well… whether lousy politician or not, this guy is perhaps the best example of liberal mind, if my analysis is right. (Please study his biography.) What is the characteristic of Aharon Barak’s Supreme Court called? Liberalism?
Somehow, I can’t understand why I can’t hear any criticism from Aharon Barak whenever his boys and girls rebel against his life-long achievement. This is the guy, who always, openly criticizes Prof. Friedmann’s reform for damaging human rights. Isn’t this case directly against Jewish Tradition of Aharon Barak (Sep 13, 2006)? I thought so. (Please, I wrote that I did have an opinion, but couldn’t write it. And the fact that Dorit Beinisch disappeared from this case made me suspect more.)
Aharon Barak: Friedmann endangers legal system Mar 2, 2009 / By Haaretz
Aharon Barak: Anyone who cares about human rights must realize that Friedmann cannot continue to serve as justice minister,”
Please check
From Supreme Court Inside/Outside Israel (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
Supreme Court okays destroying (Israeli Arab) terrorist’s home Mar 18, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) Dwayat’s father argued that he was not responsible for his son’s actions, and that the impending demolition constituted a disproportionate response as the multi-story building was home to the extended Dwayat family. (…) In the early years of the second intifada, demolition of terrorists’ houses was a common practice, but the 2005 findings of the Shani Commission concluded the practice did not serve any deterrent purpose. Public pressure to renew the practice mounted after the Merkaz Harav terror attack, which was also carried out by a Jerusalem resident.
Below is what Hoopoe explained reason of Prof. Friedmann being called lousy politician. Perhaps, this posting should go along with Hoopoe’s other opinions such as ‘Checks & Balances’ or ‘Sick-of-Judicial-Activism’.
Lieberman Fumes as Ex-Judges Try to Block Friedmann Appointment Mar 3, 2009 / By Arutz Sheva, Gil Ronen
Talkbacks for this article 10
3. Enough Already – Time to put a stop to Judicial Activism in Israel. Lieberman is right on this, if the judges want to influence politics, let them stand for elected office, if they are not willing to stand before the people’s judgement, they should implement the law as written by the Knesset without bias. / Nehama, UK (04/03/09)
4. Ideology and ego have no place where justice is at stake – It’s at times like this that I appreciate the US system, warts and all. Three branches, checks and balances. Here the executive nominates federal judges, the legislature must confirm, and the judicial proffers its opinion only when asked. But not in Israel. There, the Courts make their own rules, effectively choose their own members, and tolerate no challenge to their authority. That’s why Friedman is needed. / Raymond in DC, Washington, USA (04/03/09)
Lieberman: The More They Fight Friedmann, the More I Insist Mar 4, 2009 / By Arutz Sheva, Gil Ronen
Talkbacks for this article 4
4. Stick by your man. – Friedman is a major problem for the fancy folks. He is an untaintable secular person who is not automatically anti-Jews. Therefore, it is difficult for the elite to smear Friedman publically or blackmail him privately. Friedman want to put public influence back into the Judicial system. Those who currently control the Supreme Court want to apply “world views” where all can be judged (often by foreign standards). The courts method of stopping any change is to apply various forms of public and private pressue. So far Friedman has been immune to these efforts. That is why it is important to let Friedman continue. Currently some feel that this Court is the most undemocratic system in the free world. May it crash soon. / johnson, usa (05/03/09)
Report: Netanyahu has Accepted All of Lieberman’s Demands May 6, 2009 / By Arutz Sheva, Gil Ronen
Talkbacks for this article 9
1. Why is Friedmann a bone in the throat of the Left? – While Friedmann is not religious he does have something that much of the post-Zionist lack, he has integrity. He has shown himself to been fair to all sides and often that means not to attack the “other.” This irritates the liberals that have used the judicial system to inflict punishment on the religious and pro-Jewish members of the State. The second problem with Friedmann is that he is not tainted. Usually, the Left will threaten those that they want to influence. So far they haven’t found anything to attack Friedmann with. Not being able to influence him is a major concern of the elite. / john, nyc (06/03/09)
Below is directly from Prof. Friedmann when FOLKS started to call him lousy politician. Please compare this with happenings since then.
Beinisch takes off her gloves in fight with Friedmann Aug. 1, 2007 / By Jerusalem Post
For the first time since Daniel Friedmann was appointed justice minister and embarked on his campaign to reform the court system by weakening the Supreme Court, Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch on Wednesday lifted the veil of diplomacy that she has maintained and attacked him directly and bitterly. (…) Beinisch was referring to a plan announced last week by Friedmann to change the system of appointing the presidents of all the courts, including the Supreme Court. (…) In his letter (to Beinisch), Friedmann said he never used the style Beinisch employed in her letter (to him), and never spoke in the way Cheshin had. Friedmann added that he had never called on Benisch to resign.
Evelyn Gordon: Civil Fights: Why High Court’s champions must back Ne’eman Mar 18, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) Though Friedmann outspokenly advocates judicial reform, his two years in office achieved exactly nothing. (…) And while Friedmann did help to erode the taboo against public criticism of the court, his attacks were probably less effective in this regard than Dorit Beinisch’s responses: The sight of the Supreme Court president hurling invective and lobbying ministers and MKs like any politician severely undermined the claim that the court should be above criticism. THE REAL REASON for the court’s declining status is not Friedmann, but its ongoing interference in controversial political issues. (…) SHETREET’S PROPOSALS are actually too moderate. The court, however, refuses to change direction on its own. (…)
Dorit Beinisch and Daniel Friedmann… Who is a lousy politician? Please check http://danielfriedmann.com/index.html. One of the oddest homepage I’ve ever seen. Is this a lousy human being?
This author made a comparison between Daniel Friedmann and Yaakov Neeman and called Prof. Friedmann a lousy politician. What’s the difference between Prof. Friedmann and former JM Neeman? Please check Neeman’s very-lousy-political story during his term. Simply, Prof. Friedmann didn’t give up while others did, including former JM Neeman. In addition, Yaakov Neeman was such a skilled and experienced political operator that he had never raised an issue on the Judicial Appointment, which means far more radical reforms further down the line… according to the same author.
First of all, who started this LOUSY political game? According to Beinsich’s favorite media, it was Dorit Beinisch herself, and I’m pretty sure that she was sure of her victory when she wanted her foes to find her announcement of war from the media. Then, Prof. Friedmann exactly pointed out that he had never called on Benisch to resign.
This Jewish jurist was just… so sick of Beinisch Politics, which has nothing to do with LAW, especially after Beinisch’s NILI COHEN affair, and saw no future from Israel’s Justice System that he rather wanted to make everything open to public, instead of supporting Jewish Branja’s Secret Society and its golden tradition. But then, it was a real fun to find that it was also Dorit Beinsich herself, who acknowledged her lack of qualification. And then, this female jurist preferred to drive Aharon Barak’s liberalistic(?) justice system into opportunists’ timeserving populism… in the name of Judicial Activism. Am I wrong?
It was easy to analyze this situation. Dorit Beinisch’s Judicial Activism always reminded me of Waltraud Meier’s sold-out concert, which can’t be possible without being supported by media’s foul play.
What’s the difference between my computer work and Prof. Friedmann’s Knesset work? Do FOLKS want me to play the devil’s advocate? Still no problem with me. Now that this bimbo-battle is only staring, it will NOT be fun if Dorit Beinisch gives up her precious title, Supreme Court President. She should live the longest life and watch how many (non) Jewish brains enjoy reading all the happenings in Banana-Republic, starting from Talkbacks: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003).
I know. Just like Waltraud Meier in German Wagner Society, this female Jew can’t live without enjoying public attention. I can help her more. Remember? I promised Italian prime minister to contact all his electorates and it will take years. Then, I won’t give up Jewish part until I contact the last Diaspora/Israeli Jew.
Just out of curiosity…
Why doesn’t Dorit Beinisch do her favorite, old trick any more… regarding media as a tool for manipulation?
This B*TCH used Barenboim as a human shield to protect her family from KACH members?
We’ll see.
However, I don’t think it is a good idea for FOLKS, including members of Anti-Beinisch Club, to denounce Prof. Friedmann by calling him a lousy politician… perhaps for the sake of their future professional life in Beinisch’s Banana-Republic.
Editorial: An appointment and a disgrace Mar 1, 2009 / By Haaretz
(…) Before the election, Netanyahu made it clear in various forums that he would ensure that his party held the justice portfolio and would keep Friedmann out of the government. He must now fulfill his promise.
The return of the judicial activism critic Mar 13, 2009 / By Haaretz, Tomer Zarchin
Neeman has criticized the public spats between Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann and Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch, saying it damages public faith in the legal system when people see legal officials acting like politicians. Disagreements should be resolved in an appropriate manner, not through mutual recrimination, he has argued. Nevertheless, like Friedmann, Neeman is a harsh critic of the Supreme Court’s judicial activism. (…) In 2002, Neeman chaired a public commission (…) Basic Law (…) These recommendations were never adopted, but Friedmann recently secured cabinet approval for a similar proposal. Unlike Friedmann, however, Neeman has never expressed a desire to change the composition of the Judicial Appointments Committee. Friedmann wanted to alter the composition to make elected officials a majority of the panel, whereas currently, five of the nine members are unelected legal officials – three Supreme Court justices and two Bar Association representatives.
Please check
From Friedmannism
Supreme Court to Yaakov Ne’eman: This dog would not be allowed to leave deep scratches on the furniture.
SO… former JM Neeman has to promise that the dog shall not leave deep scratches on the furniture, because his criminal-or-corruption record is still there. I just feel funny when I watch FOLKS, Haaretz and then Jerusalem Post, starting their project to make Bibi the greatest prime minister while threatening the entire members of Kadima to serve Likud, after receiving Neeman’s promise that he wouldn’t touch the composition of the Judicial Appointments Committee.
I feel no need to collect those articles. Those who are interested in Beinisch’s Bibi project had better check Editorials from both media.
But then, should I feel pity on these Jewish hearts and brains, who still don’t know how to give up? Curiously, these are from Diaspora Jews, which sound less RADICAL than Israeli Jews. Interesting. Then, I’m thinking again. Don’t you think Labor party should hurry to join Bibi’s governmetn only to block Neeman’s political reforms? Who knows? Months later, this respected jurist might also be called a lousy politician. If I were Ophir Paz-Pines or Shelly Yachimovich, who are so concerned about Friedmannism destroying Anything-Beinisch, I would run to Bibi.
Evelyn Gordon: Civil Fights: Why High Court’s champions must back Ne’eman Mar 18, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
Talkbacks for this article 7
1. Why Israel’s Supreme Court Needs Reform – The Israeli Supreme Court’s mission seems to be to impose the views of Israel’s Left on the country instead of faithfully upholding the rule of law. The Court has come to be seen as another self-interested political actor with its own agenda rather than as an impartial custodian of the law and that’s why its standing has plummeted in Israeli society. Two reforms are needed: an end to the Court selecting its own membership without Knesset confirmation and an end to judicial activism where the Court makes its own laws. We hope incoming Justice Minister Ya’akov Ne’eman will achieve these reforms. / NormanF – USA (03/19/2009 01:22)
6. Court – Don`t forget the method of selecting new members of the court, which resembles an aristocracy or monarchy more than an democracy. / ED – US (03/19/2009 16:54)
Netanyahu may seek two-week extension Mar 13, 2009 / By Jerusalem Post
(…) The meeting came a day after it became clear that Daniel Friedmann would not remain justice minister, which was Labor’s main demand for joining Netanyahu’s government. (…) “Unlike Friedmann, Barak has no problem with Neeman. Bibi hasn’t closed the door on Labor joining the government.” the Barak adviser said. (…) MK Ophir Paz-Pines (Labor) issued a statement saying that even without Friedmann, Netanyahu’s government would be antagonistic to the legal establishment.
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
02 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
From MARCH 10 – 16, 2009 in Section: Nationalist-Govn’t-Please (Nov 24, 2008 to Present)
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
OF COURSE, I DO HAVE AN OPINION. MAY I WRITE?
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
Yisrael Beiteinu Wants Justice Ministry for Friedmann Feb 25, 2009 / By Arutz Sheva
Friedmann’s Critics, Supporters Weigh In (…) Dorit Beinsich (…) The Movement for Quality of Government appealed to Binyamin Netanyahu and other senior Likud members to get Friedmann out of office. (…) However, Friedmann won strong support from the Land of Israel Legal Forum, which argued that the minister faced criticism “because his criticism of the Supreme Court bothers the court’s President.” Friedmann stood up to the “ruling elite,” the forum said. “The reforms begun by ministry Friedmann have a positive influence on public truest in the legal system… The system has begun a process of self-examination, and of allowing criticism from those who wish to strengthen the state as a Jewish and democratic country,” said forum head Nachi Ayal.
Talkbacks for this article 8
1. What is the opposition to Friedman? – that he believes there should be some check on the power of the Supreme Court. Why on earth would Nethanyahu oppose that? / Phil S, California (25/02/09)
5. I’ve got no problem with Friedman continuing at Justice. – I don’t necessarily agree with every one of his proposals, but I recognize he’s constrained with the “Israeli way”. That said, reform is long overdue. And just about anything that upsets Beinish is OK in my book. / Raymond in DC, Washington, USA (26/02/09)
Lieberman Fumes as Ex-Judges Try to Block Friedmann Appointment Mar 3, 2009 / By Arutz Sheva
Talkbacks for this article 10
7. The Best Letter of Recomendation – This is the BEST thing that I’ve heard about H”K Lieberman yet. In spite of some Halachic issues, if Aharon Barak fears him, he must be a great Jew. / Aryeh, Haifa (04/03/09)
No matter who says what… I prefer NOT to see Daniel Friedmann to be criticized as Liebermann’s stain remover. He is not that cheap. Rather, I want to see Likud’s Saar, who is Beinisch’s real friend and also a political ally of Labor’s Yechimovich, or Likud’s Meridor, who is Beinisch’s real puppy, to take over this troublesome Justice portfolio. I know how much real right wing politicians detest Beinisch’s Supreme Court. Their hard working will immediately cause a deep rift within the government and eventually weaken Bibi’s leadership.
Remember? How has Likud’s Saar made more mess by siding with Dorit Beinisch months ago? Just feel funny whenever I find the exactly same opinion, which reminds me of Olmert-haters, who didn’t mind appreciating JM Friedmann as Olmert’s ONLY achievement. *.*
Please check
Phoenix-Bibi
Meridor ‘Working Very Hard’ to Create Golan Giveaway Coalition (Dec 19, 2008).: (…) Moshe Teomim, strategic advisor, boasted that it was he, who sold Bibi on the idea of advocating an “economic peace” with the PA. “I gave [the idea] to him ten months ago,” Teomim said. He added that in retrospect, however, he thinks the idea was not a very good one. (…) Meridor said that he agreed with nearly everything that PM Olmert said. His only points of disagreement with Olmert were regarding the Second Lebanon War, which Meridor thinks Olmert bungled, and the “attack on the justice system” by JM Friedmann. Olmert’s speech was largely devoted to the prospects of peace with Syria. (…) Meridor is considered very close to Supreme Court President Justice Dorit Beinisch. This matter came under journalistic debate when Meridor’s name was floated as a possible Justice Minister in 2006. According to Attorney Yossi Dar, Meridor and Beinisch routinely go out with their families “to concerts, holiday trips etc.” Meridor’s name has also been mentioned as a possible Minister of Justice in Binyamin Netanyahu’s future government. Another candidate is Gideon Saar. Saar was an aide to both Beinisch and Arbel and is also considered very close to them.
(JIWON: Finally, Phoenix-Bibi, Knesset-Jokes and Banana-Republic merged into Welcome to Jerusalem in the name of LIKUD. HO! I can now understand the reason of Sa’ar-bill (Jun 19, 2008)., which was mocked by the Nobel Prize laureate. I can also understand HOW and WHY Dorit Beinisch supported Bibi’s election campaign all behind the scenes. What amazes me is that Dorit Beinisch and Phoenix-Bibi all walked along arm in arm while Bibi’s Jewish voters all identified Banana Republic Queen with Kadima’s Olmert and insulted them. What a country…)
From Talkbacks: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)
1. Article No. 73: Sa’ar-bill: Nobel laureate Aumann applies game theory to judge selection (Jun 17, 2008).: (…) During the meeting Aumann had much less to say about game theory than he did about what was wrong with the Supreme Court and the committee that chooses it. (…) He added that he was “shocked” to hear that Ben-Sasson had asked Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch for her opinion of the bill. “This contradicts the separation of the branches of government,” he said in his introductory remarks. He also blamed the Supreme Court for its efforts to curb its power. “The court brought the politicization upon itself because it deals with matters pertaining to social values, politics and security,” he charged. There should also be no judges or lawyers on the committee that choose the justices of the Supreme Court in the first place, he added later, since the court deals with these three areas. (…)
2. Article No. 74: Sa’ar-bill: Beinisch gives quiet support to upping judicial appt. majority (Jun 19, 2008).: (…) Beinisch thereby indicated that she does not oppose the bill. (…) Robert (Yisrael) Aumann, a Nobel Prize laureate in economics, raised a different issue, arguing that lawyers and judges should not sit on the JAC at all. Currently, the JAC’s nine members include three Supreme Court justices and two Bar Association representatives, along with two ministers and two Knesset members. “It’s a scandal that lawyers are represented on the committee, when they must appear before the judges [they appoint],” he said. “This is institutional corruption.” Regarding the issue over which he had been invited to the Constitution Committee – explaining how the bill would affect the current balance of power among the JAC’s four factions – Aumann said the Supreme Court justices would retain their current dominance in the appointments process, since the bill gave any bloc of three members a veto. He therefore opposed the bill, saying it would prevent a more fundamental reform of the system.
(…click Nationalist-Govn’t-Please to read the entire text…)
01 =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
From Section: Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch (Oct 2 – Dec 19, 2008).
OCTOBER 2 – NOVEMBER 24, 2008
DEAR GUYs,
I AM ALMOST DONE. I WILL BE ABLE TO RESUME MY MAILING BUSINESS IN NO TIME.
From Supreme Court after Olmert (Beinisch should get rid of Friedmann as quickly as possible, From Sep 3, 2008 to Present)
LIVNI tells MERETZ: I WON’T DISMISS JUSTICE MINISTER FRIEDMANN (Oct 2, 2008)
JIWON:
Meretz MK Zahava Gal-On says bla, bla, bla… Then I must say that I can’t help suspecting if her IQ is two-digit-numbered. Does she still remember why I deliberately omitted her name during my report, Talkbacks: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)? By then, unlike Labor’s Shelly Yechimovich, Meretz’s Gal-On behaved as an innocent victim pretending to be out of Beinisch’s Secret Society, and then received my open support. I even read how Meretz’s new(!) leader Haim Oron changed his words about his good(?) relationship with Olmert while mentioning Kadima’s candidate Livni. (Some months ago, I happened to save his Olmert-article but deleted it.) Now that they openly side with Labor’s Barak, I can’t help suspecting if all the incidents are caused from the very fact that their real issue is not JM Friedmann but Kadima MK Haim Ramon and his terrific political leadership. I just can’t help suspecting. Anyway, Kadima’s leader Tzipi Livni did a terrific job. A leader should sound like this. This kind of leader will receive my full support.
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
♥ PART 2, Long live JM Friedmann! ♥
In sum, I will resume my mailing to EU and EVERYBODY. I will travel ALL over the world and plead Palestinian Right to Targeted Killing of DORIT BEINISCH:
Dear European Countries (WEDO in Europe, From Aug 13, 2008 to Present) and
Mail-Recipients
To be exact… HOW MANY POLITICAL HAPPENINGS HAVE HAPPENED SINCE DORIT BEINISCH’S APPOINTMENT AS THE PRESIDENT OF ISRAELI SUPREME COURT?
Apart from the happenings in the Haaretz in recent years, please check the date about the happening between the Supreme Court and Palestinians. October 2006… This is right beginning of Dorit Beinisch’s era:
Absentee Property Law: Settlers, IDF & State quietly expropriate land (West Bank settlement construction nearly doubled this year, From Aug, 1993 to Present)
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
JIWON:
When was JM Friedmann appointed? How much was he able to succeed in his reform plan? Below is an article from the Haaretz, and therefore PART of Dear-Arab-Readers. Is there a stronger personality than Friedmann in the field of Israeli LAW? He is not the first one, who wanted to do SOMETHING, but NOBODY succeeded in. Let’s face the fact. JM Friedmann himself could do nothing until my ‘comical’ involvement. I promise. With other figures sitting in this position, no one will be able to do anything NEW/GOOD:
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
♥ PART 3, Beinisch’s era since 1994 ♥
This is a report from the Chairman of Haaretz.
From A Purge at Haaretz (Is Haaretz going to become another Bibi-ton? How long will it take? From Aug, 2006 to Present)
Dependence or independence (Sep 3, 2007): “But Dorit Beinisch was appointed to the Supreme Court 12 years before she became president, and in 12 years, surprises can happen.”
How many hours do you think it took for me to make this simple collection? I always remember Beinisch’s definition about my computer work, ‘tendentious attempts,’ so I clicked ALL the possible articles about this new figure, the Chairman of Haaretz. Please compare this comment with the ‘official’ statement of JM Friedmann and others, including Dorit Beinisch herself. Who is telling the truth? Who is insulting whom? Who is talking about PRACTICAL MANNER? Why don’t they keep going? I will check EVERYTHING in PUBLIC places called Jewish Groups in FACEBOOK.
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
Not surprisingly, Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On appears in
Barak, Beinisch, Friedmann & Citizenship Law (From Jul 31. 2003 to Present).
I find something more. I am wondering if Meretz party’s political success in recent years has been based on populism…:
Galon-Bill: Beinisch expressed vehement opposition to the idea of live broadcasts from the Supreme Court (Feb 2, 2005)
♥ PART 4, Promotion Canapes ♥
♥ Dear Labor’s Yechimovich and Meretz’s Gal-On, ♥
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
Now, I can clearly say that this is a female who proves the best example of Egocentric Opportunist. I feel very sorry for Aharon Barak if he still considers himself as the dearest/greatest mentor of Dorit Beinsich:
Talkbacks: Beinisch Politics has nothing to do with LAW
Article No. 0: Secret Society December 21, 2006 / By Haaretz:
(…) That was in March 2003, on the day that, in the opinion of journalist Naomi Levitsky, “the Supreme Court justices rose up against their president.” (…) At the meeting itself, Beinisch did not talk very much. She had done the work earlier behind the scenes, in discussions with her fellow justices. At the time, she barely wrote any legal decisions; she was too busy working to block Cohen from morning till night. (…) At the end of that meeting, as Levitsky describes it, “it was clear that most of the justices were siding with Beinisch, the president-designate, and turning their backs on the incumbent president. This was a situation the likes of which had never been seen before in the Supreme Court. (…) I knew there had been a major drama in the Nili Cohen affair, and I wanted to investigate it thoroughly. The matter of Nili Cohen was less interesting to me that the transfer of power. Three and a half years before the changing of the presidents there was an exchange of power, and that is something that fascinates me.” (…) Barak, who heard from Okon about the outcome of the conversation, understood that the story was over. Did Barak understand at that point that his status had declined, that his exclusive hold on the center of power in the Supreme Court had ended? [Levitsky: "I can't answer that in his place, but I would guess that he understood. At the time he was very hurt. Anyone who met him then could see that he had changed completely. He wasn't the same person, he had lost some of his vitality."] (…)
Now, it is a time to read Dorit Beinisch’s life-long professional career. As I wrote in My-Personal-Opinion about Ramon-Scandal in Hello, Is Dorit Beinisch talking about ME? Public Slander? (Regarding Ruth Gavison, From Jun 23 to Jul 21, 2008), (please check Jul 15), sexual intercourse doesn’t always explain ‘Promotion Canapes’ in old-fashioned or highly competitive working places.
Why do you think it was a piece of cake for me to pick up certain happenings from the original articles and make another collection in order to explain what a valuable comment Talkbackers posted? The only thing I added was that this was in fact nothing but a bimbo’s favorite trick. I am curious if Dorit Beinisch still uses this trick even after my ‘comical’ involvement. While organizing Beinisch-articles, I was amazed at the way Beinisch earned her female foes. It was amazing… so inferior… so childish… yet the entire Israel fell under this bimbo’s dirty, cheap spell:
Talkbacks: Beinisch, Friedmann, Sex-Scandal, Corruption (Kangaroo Court from Sep 12, 2003)
Talkbacks: Beinisch Politics has nothing to do with LAW
The relationship between male and female, especially in professional world, differs from the one between male and male or between female and female. I am talking about the real professionalism. Professional opinions of female/male partners can have quite an influence over her/his male/female partners’ mentality. When it happens in a positive way, the result can be much more productive, simply because GOD created our human species in a different way. Of course, it could happen in a negative way, and we all know what it means. I promise. If Dorit Beinisch really considered Aharon Barak as her true mentor, rather than a subject of ‘Promotion Canapes,’ Aharon Barak could have proved his great LEGAL ideas more and more as he got older and older… for the past twelve years. He could have found himself as the greatest Jurist in Israeli history after his retirement, along with his dearest friends Amnon Rubinstein and Daniel Friedmann. That’s professional female junior/partner/senior’s power, which shines more when it reveals maternal instincts. A great female knows Human Rights better than her male partner does.
I am curious if Labor’s Shelly Yechimovich really took others’ kids as her own whenever she made something political decision. Now, I clearly know the highest price to save Still-Alive-Schalit was Labor’s great achievement:
Schalit Is Still Alive… (Regarding Hizbullah/Schalit-Deal, from Jun 13 to Present)
Shelly Yechimovich (Labor): Lebanon Before Winograd Report (Beinisch Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann), which is part of
P.P.S.: Beinisch’s Secret Society Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann
Meanwhile, why do you think I never give up insisting that Bibi’s Glick is married to Jerusalem attorney? I promise. In the world of female professionals, there was no exception:
BIBI/GLICK & READERS: WE ARE ISRAELI AMBASSADOR to UN (From Aug 25, to Present), which is part of
Hoopoe in my Knesset-blog
I promise. I will collect ALL the possible articles on this issue, DORIT BEINISCH toward/during/after YITZHAK RABIN’s ASSASSINATION. We’ll see…
Dorit Beinisch toward/during/after Yitzhak Rabin’s Assassination (From Aug, 1993 to Present)
♥ Citizenship Law ♥
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
♥ PART 3, again ♥
NOW, PLEASE THINK AGAIN. Who is telling the truth? Who is insulting whom? Who is talking about PRACTICAL MANNER? Why don’t they keep going? I will check EVERYTHING in PUBLIC places called Jewish Groups in FACEBOOK.
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
0. The chairman of Haaretz said bla-bla-bla (…) But Dorit Beinisch was appointed to the Supreme Court 12 years before she became president, and in 12 years, surprises can happen. (…)
1. Amnon Rubinstein said bla-bla-bla (…) warning against the “rule of the unelected officials.” (…) Shamgar should be called back into service for two years, to allow the judiciary to recover (…)
2. Daniel Friedmann said bla-bla-bla (…) the WEAKEST Supreme Court in the history of the country with the BROADEST AUTHORITY ever (…) The law-enforcement system is divorced from the reality (…)
3. Two Petitions to slam or support JM Daniel Friedmann (Aug 13, 2007)
4. Dorit Beinisch said bla-bla-bla (…) Nili Cohen (…) I am trying to strengthen the constitutional aspect of the court, the public aspect of the work here.
5. International Community said bla-bla-bla (…) Barak is a highly controversial figure throughout the Middle East. Israel is not a clear constitutional democracy (…)
6. Terrified of Judicial Reform (May 2, 2008): (…) No longer can it be claimed that criticism of the Supreme Court is confined to proto-fascist, right-wing thugs. Friedmann is both an Israel Prize laureate in law and a man of the Left. Just how long this debate has been suppressed can be discerned from the hysteria that has greeted Friedmann’s proposals for reform of the judicial system. In a pre-Pesach interview with Ha’aretz’s Ari Shavit, Barak predicted Friedmann would turn Israel into a “Third World country.” At least he did not threaten to cut off Friedmann’s hand, as did his former colleague on the Court Mishael Cheshin. In the Ha’aretz interview, Barak accused Friedmann of seeking to dominate the entire legal system. But that is precisely what Barak himself did as Court President. (…) Barak employed his dominance of the judicial selection committee to prevent anyone who did not share his judicial philosophy from ascending to the Supreme Court. (…) Judges in the lower courts knew that their advancement depended on the favor of Aharon Barak. So did law professors who aspired to careers on the bench. And finally, so did the attorneys-general and state prosecutors who hoped to follow the traditional path to the Court. They faithfully snuffed out any who dared to challenge the Court’s power. Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman, Reuven Rivlin when his appointment as Justice Minister was being mooted, and Bar Association president Dror Hoter-Yishai were all neutered on the basis of trumped-up indictments, quickly dismissed by the courts, or criminal files subsequently closed. FRIEDMANN’S PROPOSALS do nothing to strengthen his power. Rather they are designed to reduce the power of the Court President to ENFORCE UNIFORMITY. Extending the term of lower court presidents and deputy presidents from four to seven years, while doing away with reappointments, would increase the independence of the court presidents and remove their incentive to keep one eye perpetually cocked on the Court President. Taking away the selection of lower court presidents and deputies from the Court President and giving it to a committee of judges and ex-judges, would lessen the power of the Court President to enforce uniformity of thought over the entire judicial system. Doing away with the practice of “temporary” appointments of lower court judges to the Supreme Court ?a practice designed to allow the Supreme Court justices to ensure that would be colleagues can be counted upon to toe the line ?would again open up the judicial system to more internal debate and fresh thought. The Friedmann proposal that terrifies Barak most is that to end the chokehold of the sitting justices over appointments to the Court itself ?a chokehold that Barak weakly justifies as necessary to preserve collegiality. Yet Barak admits that “most constitutional courts in the world are chosen by political bodies.” And no democracy invests sitting justices with the power over the judicial selection process they exercise in Israel. (…) Defenders of our current judicial system, Barak chief among them, claim that it is necessary to protect minority rights. But it turns out that the minority they are most eager to protect is the Court itself (…)
7. Legal Affairs: Bench pressure (Jun 26, 2008): (…) The petition filed this week by Aviva and Noam Schalit has triggered another round of debate over the prerogatives of the High Court of Justice. (…) Which raises the question: How does the Supreme Court even entertain the possibility of rejecting a government decision on a matter so clearly related to questions of WAR and PEACE, and the SECURITY of tens of thousands of citizens living adjacent to the Gaza Strip – issues that are clearly the RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT? And why didn’t it throw out the petition without considering it? This question echoes the accusations of “over-activism” that Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann has been hurling at the court over the past year-and-a-half. During his time in office, Friedmann has raised the possibility of prohibiting the court, through legislation, from hearing petitions related to SECIROTU MATTERS and those affecting the GOVERNMENT BUDGET. He also supported a private Knesset member’s bill to bar the court from hearing petitions related to CITIZENSHIP MATTERS. SO FAR, NONE OF THESE INITIATIVES HAS COME TO FRUITION. (…)
8. High Court President: Wait Till Gov’t Change to Select Judges (Oct 29, 2008): Retired district Judge Uri Shtruzman supports Friedmann’s initiatives, for the most part. “Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann’s suggestions actually reduce politicization, but the discussion around them is not on-topic,” Judge Shtruzman said. “Every initiative that Minister Friedmann comes up with is like a red flag for many people.” Shtruzman, who sat in the Tel Aviv district court, said he supported the minister’s initiatives, “although they can be improved here or there.” “Ever since the Supreme Court became an active court which deals not only with pure questions of law and jurisprudence, but also in political matters, the public’s trust in it has deteriorated,” Shtruzman said.
9. Judicial power grab (Month Day, Year): (…) THUS IF the government is to have any hope of enacting immigration reform – or any other policy frowned on by the current justices – it must reform Israel’s judicial selection process to bring it into line with those of other Western democracies. In other democracies, the appointment of justices is left entirely to the executive and legislature; the justices themselves have no say in the matter. And this is essential to maintain a proper balance between the three branches of government. Otherwise, the enormous power that the court derives from being the ultimate arbiter of legality, combined with the justices’ complete independence once appointed (since they receive lifetime tenure, they need not curry favor to retain their positions), would leave the elected branches powerless against the justices’ whims. That is precisely the situation in Israel today: When the court denies the elected government the ability to set policy on an issue as fundamental as immigration – based on a self-created “right” anchored in no law whatsoever – the balance of power is clearly grossly skewed in the court’s favor. But only by radically reforming the judicial selection system can this imbalance ever be corrected. (…)
By the way, did Aharon Barak oppose Prof. Ruth Gavison’s Supreme Court nomination? Where was Dorit Beinisch while her mentor was busy at his Gavison-job, especially after her betrayal of Barak in March 2003? Has she been in Australia to run Kangaroo court? For twelve years, I mean. Beinisch (b. 1942) is merely three years older than Gavison (b. 1942). How was Aharon Barak able to form his firm belief against Three-Years-Beinisch’s-Junior more and more as he got older and older? Just out of curiosity. Because… for a LEGAL novice like me, Human Rights in this area doesn’t differ from Human Rights in that area. Human Rights is nothing but Human Rights. Because… for a mere FEMALE like me, Ruth Gavison looks far superior to Dorit Beinisch, even at the first glance.
And then, whenever I think of Human Rights, I find Aharon Barak more from Gavison than from Beinsich. I feel that Aharon Barak’s genuine ideas will shine more if through Gavison’s ‘systematic agenda.’ Perhaps, it’s because I am a musician, who has a heart only and no brain:
Aharon Barak’s agenda (Nov 17, 2005): (…) Barak has an extremely well-developed view of the court’s proper function. In a nutshell, it is that the court should be the arbiter of every major political and social issue. As he explained in a 1992 article, “in my eyes, the world is filled with law. Every human behavior is subject to a legal norm. Even when a certain type of activity – such as friendship or subjective thoughts – is ruled by the autonomy of the individual will, this autonomy exists because it is recognized by the law… There are no areas in life which are outside the law.” (…)
But then, it was Supreme Court, which violated its LAW.
From Supreme Court after Olmert (Beinisch should get rid of Friedmann as quickly as possible, From Sep 3, 2008 to Present)
JUDGES SELECTION meeting descends into farce due to government’s status (Sep 22, 2008): NO Talkbacks Allowed: (…) A JUDGES ELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING ON THE APPOINTMENT OF THREE NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICES descended into farce when the current justices, including the court’s president, Dorit Beinisch, claimed that the committee no longer had the authority to choose new judges, saying that the current government had a transitional status. The other committee members, including Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann and Environment Protection Minister Gideon Ezra, turned to Attorney-General Menahem Mazuz to ask his opinion on the matter. Mazuz came into the meeting room and explained that the COMMITTEE DID INDEED HAVE LEGAL AND JUDICIAL AUTHORITY. NEVERTHELESS, THE JUSTICES DISAGREED AND THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
Now, everybody knows why I used to call IT a Bimbo-Battle. According to the rule of this bimbo-battle for the last ten years, Dorit Beinisch and her followers, including politicians, will trumpet more and more about Aharon Barak’s genuine ideas while ‘destroying’ EVERYBODY/EVERYTHING INSIDE/OUTSIDE their Secret Society (Dec 21, 2006). And then, I would have to appreciate NOTHING about this great Jewish Jurist and just stick to Analysis: The Anti-Beinisch club (Feb 6, 2007). Because… it will rather become a shortcut toward protecting Real Human Rights.
(Updated on NOVEMBER 15, 2008)
From Supreme Court Inside/Outside Israel (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
From Settlers are above LAW (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
When ILLEGAL outposts are evacuated… Whose fault is it? Police/IDF or Settlers? Or Court? (From Oct 27, 2008 to Present) (Please click this to click the exact title again.)
On November 6, 2008, the COURT Released Federman and Clashes on Farm continue and will continue. So, is this how NOT ONE settlement outpost has been taken down since 2006? Meanwhile, ANOTHER INCIDENT happens… so… HOW MUCH MONEY the SETTLERs will lose UNTIL they are forcibly and finally evicted?
Cold winter is coming, and they have NOTHING to lose. Dear Guys… what kind of reaction do you expect from those poor folks?
FUNNY… it is none but DORIT BEINISCH, who echoes JM DANIEL FRIEDMANN that it is not a job of Supreme Court. The article says, “The court has made it clear that the dispute over ownership must be resolved in district court.” Then, how many YEARs the SETTLERs should be lost between District and High Court?
From When ILLEGAL outposts are evacuated… Whose fault is it? Police/IDF or Settlers? Or Court? (From Oct 27, 2008 to Present)
At the weekly Cabinet meeting today (Sunday), 26.10.08: Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that such remarks are unacceptable and called for quick action to punish those responsible. He emphasized that there was an embarrassing forgiveness towards those same people in the courts and added that the law-enforcement authorities cannot abide the fact that this undermines the authority of the state over its citizens.
FUNNY… after playing the greatest role to support Dorit Beinisch all behind the scenes and then even in public streets, Labor’s EHUD BARAK starts blaming WHOM?
From Supreme Court Inside/Outside Israel (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
Please check NOVEMBER 8, 2008.
BUT THEN, what about all those poor PALESTINIANs? I believe that any Palestinian issue inside Israel should be handled case by case. My problem is HOW LONG and HOW MUCH those poor folks should waste until Supreme Court decides something for-or-against them.
Now that I begin to understand the simple fact; what a terrific job Beinisch’s Supreme Court has been doing… How long will it take for this Israeli Queen to drive her Jewish people into the SELF-DESTRUCTION… and how many collections will I have to make until this moment?
From Supreme Court & Palestinians: (It stinks… but I’m still not ready for the collection of articles on these issues.)
1. High Court gives IDF 90 days to test travel ban changes (Oct 29, 2008)
2. Court frowns on villagers’ demand that barrier be moved to Green Line (Nov 4, 2008)
3. Switzerland: Israel breaking int’l law by razing Palestinian homes (Nov 13, 2008)
4. THERE WILL BE MORE… already too tired!
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
JIWON: BY THE WAY, WHO IS THIS GUY??? I found this on Nov 13, 2008, but this book was published on May 14, 2008. It was before Dear-Arab-Readers. How many readers bought this book?
Blog: Master of Discourse: Sages Rule: Who Brought Olmert Down (and Why) Aug 20, 2008 / By Victim of Discourse
Sages Rule: Prime Minister Olmert threw his towel in and gave up struggle. A powerful coalition of law and media brought him down. The Jewish state enters a new era of rule by sages, not necessarily a better one May 14, 2008 / By Israel Shamir
This system is called in Hebrew ‘haver mevi haver’, ‘a friend brings a friend’. (…) Ramon & Latin America (…) Meanwhile, the President of Israel, Moshe Katsav, the man who actually appoints judges, came under fire. He was also against Beinish’s rise to Fuhrership, and paid for it dearly. (…) And then they attacked Olmert personally. (…) If that is “Left”, then what is Right? But let us be fair, they are not Right neither Left, they are the Third Kind, totalitarian liberals. Totalitarian liberals are profoundly undemocratic, for they are forever suspicious of the Majority. They use the Minority Rights in order to undermine Majority Rule. They do not act in the interests of the minorities whose name they bear in vain: rather, they use them as a ploy for seizing supreme power. (…) Actually, the leading judges of the Supreme Court, Beinish and Arbel, are personally responsible for the outbreak of the First Intifada. As state prosecutors, they came up with a nasty legal trick, the type a rabbi might describe as “kasher aval masriach” (“it is kosher, but it stinks”). Only a minority of Palestinian lands were parcellated and privatised, while the majority of lands were in public use and were called ‘the lands of the Sultan’. The two “liberal leftist” lady lawyers claimed that these lands belong now to the Jewish State as it is now the Sultan, and thus they allowed the State to seize Palestinian common lands and give them to the settlers. Aharon Barak authorised the snatch. This mass confiscation was the reason for the First Intifada. They are also responsible for the second intifada, as they permitted Ariel Sharon his march to the Temple Mount. They are responsible for the terror, as this was caused by their glaring injustice. When they sentenced Nahum Korman to six months of public service for the murder of a Palestinian child, they signalled to the Palestinians that they should not expect legal remedies from this Court. They are responsible for the Second Lebanon War, as they blocked the release of Kuntar after Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon. More than anyone else, they are responsible for creating the apartheid system in Israel. (…)
JIWON: What the hell… Had I found this book first when I decided to write Dear-Arab-Readers, I could have saved weeks and weeks of my tired life. Did he write a novel? I only collect OFFICIAL ARTICLES. Time will tell me if this author is a weirdo or a genius reporter. Anyway, this article gave me one more clue about how Dorit Beinisch was able to block Ruth Gavinson’s Supreme Court appointment. I was just suspecting… Hence, I started my research.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Edna+Arbel+Zehava
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Edna+Arbel+Ehud+Barak
JIWON: So many information about Dorit Beinsich’s EDNA ARBEL; Noam Federman (Settler)… Media… Ehud Barak… the wiretaps and transcripts in the affair of MK Zehava Gal-On and so on…
Of course, there are SOMETHING MORE; Investigative reporter, Yoav Yitzhak… the Case against Edna Arbel and so on…
SO, EVERYBODY, except me, KNEW EVERYTHING!!!
I am pretty sure that this guy is one of Frontline REBELS Commanders. I am not. There is no doubt that this Jew is a brilliant human being, but I still don’t want to join his group. I’m also wondering if JM Daniel Friedmann started considering himself as an outsider. But still, he is trying to say how much he is misunderstood. Am I wrong?
Friedmann: Meretz and Arabs are Allies of the Supreme Court (Feb 22, 2008):
(…) The interviewers confronted Friedmann with an assertion that his main supporters today are “Shas and the radical right.” “By the same token, the Supreme Court’s allies are Meretz and the Arabs,” he answered. “It is true that Shas and the right support me on many matters, but there are also large gaps between us…” (…) Winograd Committee (…) Friedmann was then asked if he was not retroactively saying that the Kahan Committee’s decision to oust Sharon from the position of Defense Minister was wrong. He answered: “The nature of the Kahan Committee’s decision regarding Sharon is not clear to me, to this day. If they meant to depose him, they made a mistake.” The interviewers noted that the key figures in the Kahan Committee were Aharon Barak (who later became Supreme Court President), current Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch and Edna Arbel (now a Supreme Court judge and an ally of Beinisch’s).
JIWON: I wrote and wrote… that I am not a part of rebels. (Please check Dear Berlin Mayor and President of Supreme Court of Israel (Apr 22 – May 15, 2008).) If this author is really a rebellious jewel, I am not. This is just my personality. I prefer originality. Honestly speaking, the more I find disgusting information about Beinisch’s Special Society and Left-Branja, the more I want to cry. This is never what I wanted when I wanted to join Barenboim’s Israel.
Rather, I want to travel all over the world and collect all the Jewish opinions about how to realize Aharon Barak’s genuine ideas… Is it an impossible hope? I was confused… until I read this author, then I made up my mind. Let’s forget Daniel Friedmann. I didn’t collect Friedmann’s ideas. Remember? I started Dear-Arab-Readers with my desire to criticize Daniel Friedmann. I only collected Jewish articles, which have reported actual happenings during Aharon Barak and Dorit Beinisch’s life. I am curious. What will Aharon Barak say if his Jewish People answer that not Dorit Beinisch but my Jewish Readers have an ability to define Aharon Barak?
From Supreme Court Inside/Outside Israel (From Jul 25, 2008 to Present)
Please check NOVEMBER 13, 2008.
Blog: Fwd: how convenient for Beinisch (Mar 26, 2008): Aryeh sent this very insightful comment on the news: What incredible, self serving nonsense. Beinisch’s girlfriend, all on her very own, decides to jeopardize her very useful and privileged position as the journalistic insider to the Grand Master of Israel’s Supreme Cult by reveling private information. The fact that Beinisch is under continuos pressure to reduce the powers and privileges of the Supreme Cult and is increasingly being seen as ungenerous in her public stance of course have nothing to do with this revelation. We are presented with a kinder, more concerning Beinisch. Gone is the arrogant, dictatorial manipulator. Gone is the conspirator to murder, treason and subversion of justice. We are left only with the motherly concern of a woman torn by the need to protect the people of Sderot.
When Dorit Beinisch wooed the nervous young Jewish mothers, this female clearly knew that the Government had absolutely no money. So, is this how Dorit Beinisch was able to court another female group? Since homosexual human beings are famous for their sensitive characters, (Please check Dear Berlin Mayor and President of Supreme Court of Israel (Apr 22 – May 15, 2008)), what kind of trick has Dorit Beinisch used to fool them? Someone please tell me.
Gay, lesbian community fights Gavison appointment to Supreme Court bench May 12, 2005 / By Haaretz
Time to search for information about the relationship between Dorit Beinisch & Labor MK Ophir Pines, or Edna Arbel & Labor MK Ophir Pines, or Something-another & Labor MK Ophir Pines. What’s the reason of this wealthy guy’s endless support of Dort Beinisch?
Please check Dorit Beinisch’s thick skin. Who has the thickest skin? ‘American Alice Clevenger’ or ‘German Waltraud Meier’ or ‘Israeli Dorit Beinisch’ or… ‘Please-someone-tell-me-about-this-bimbo’s-nationality-Russian-or-German-or-Israeli-or-French-or-American-or-Spanish-or-British-or-Argentinean-or-Jewish-or-What Elena Bashkirova’?
Left-wing Writer David Grossman Refuses Beinisch Handshake (Nov 7, 2007): (…) Grossman lost his son in the final days of the 2006 Second Lebanon War (…) Prime Minister was informed ahead of time that Grossman would not be shaking his hand. Grossman also did not shake hands with Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch, who sat next to the Prime Minister, further away from Grossman. Both remained seated, therefore, when Grossman accepted the prize. Beinisch said, however, that she had been told before the ceremony Grossman would not shake her hand publicly. She added that she was not surprised by this; “I shook his hand earlier,” she told reporters. It was not clear what prompted Grossman to avoid a public handshake with the Supreme Court President.
From Supreme Court after Olmert (Beinisch should get rid of Friedmann as quickly as possible, From Sep 3, 2008 to Present)
High Court President: Wait Till Gov’t Change to Select Judges (Oct 29, 2008): Talkbacks: 3. everybody-from left and right hates her and has – very little trust if at all in high court rulings–unless u r a pali of course – then u LOOOVE their rulings / , (30/10/08)
I promise. This Meretz-guy will do the best job as a Defense Minister. He will remember his son whenever he has to decide something for both Israel and Palestine.
(AGAIN on OCTOBER 23, 2008)
♥ IN SUM, ♥
I WILL TRAVEL ALL OVER THE WORLD AND PLEAD PALESTINIAN RIGHT TO TARGETED KILLING OF DORIT BEINISCH.
To be honest, I am NOT interested in whether or not JM Friedmann will be lucky enough to succeed in his reform. I am only interested in MY LIFE, and only remember how Beinisch family has been treating me during the past ten years. (… more than ten, to be exact…) I promise. This Bimbo-Battle is only starting. How many human beings will I be able to ‘directly’ contact until I die?
Jewish Groups in FACEBOOK, which received my invitation (From Sep 8, 2008 to Present)
Palestinian/Arab Groups Elsewhere/Facebook, which received my invitation (From ?, 2008 to Present)
Music Lovers Elsewhere/Facebook, who received my invitation (From Aug 4, 2008 to Present)
ABOVE will be my life-long project. Therefore, I will contact Ambassador of Israel to Korea as soon as possible, after PARTLY FINISHING this work. How many professional musicians, who never/only wants to play with Waltraud Meier, will be able to receive my invitation?
Professional Musicians Elsewhere/Facebook, who received my invitation (From ?, 2008 to Present)
The President of Israeli Supreme Court is welcome to believe that our musicians have no brain. Even now, how many so-called musicians are willing to travel all over the world to prove that classical music has a power to fool intelligent human being? The audience all over the world, including all the human rights groups, which know nothing about the existence of my Knesset-blog, will answer Dorit Beinsich with a standing ovation. That’s a power of music, in which Hitler’s Nazism firmly believed in. The only difference between Jewish Beinisch and German Hitler was that this Jewish-Blood has NO ear while German-Blood had the best ear to pick up a real music to propagandize Nazi ideology. Therefore, German Hitler was able to reach human hearts all over the world, while Jewish Beinisch should be very careful to search for Bashkirova’s audience, who should be Jewish-only or No-ear or Fame-seeker. Poor Beinisch. Poorer Jews…
As I wrote in Masterclass at Merkel’s Bundestag (Sep 10-18, 2008), no matter how much I learn good things about Israel or Germany, no matter how much I want to become a part of Jewish or German history, and no matter how much I want to join Jewish or German blood, I won’t be able to change my identity. Simply, I was not born like that. Even now, the fact that I have to work, work, and work hard only to preserve sparkling beauty of Jewish or German heritage is pissing me off.
What I feel funny while reading all the articles about Dorit Beinisch is… IT ‘SEEMS’ THAT ill qualification of Dorit Beinsich as the Court President was a ‘specific(?)/general(!)’ feeling even inside the Supreme Court:
Justice Cheshin: Barak ready for people to blow up for human rights (May 24, 2006): (…) Cheshin has this to say about attempts to change the system under which seniority is used to determine the president of the Supreme Court. “Malicious people are raising these ideas,” he says, “only because of [Justice Dorit] Beinisch. Whoever raised the seniority question wants to subject Beinisch to a targeted assassination because of a personal vendetta. It is posing as a normative proposal but it is actually a personal proposal to screw Beinisch. There are so many reasons for the president to be the most senior justice, but that does not interest anyone. (…)
♥ GUESS WHAT? ♥
(Notice: This writing was written before Nov 15, 2008. Now that I know quite-things about Zehava Gal-On, is she going to behave as a Meretz MK in the 18th Knesset?)
As I wrote in Weirdly, I agree with Likud on this subject. *.* (From Jun 24 to Present), I was born in ONE-blood country and never thought of this problem until Likud’s Livnat issued Hebrew Language in her bill.
Please look at me. How many years have I read, learned about happenings in Barenboim’s Israel? Still, I am in trouble to distinguish the difference between Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. I believe… whatever it is, whether Citizenship Law or others, it should exist for the better future of Jewish/Palestinian State while accepting its past.
I write again and again… that I belong to neither Israel nor Palestine. Being as the third person, I collected and organized all those Jewish articles. Now, it is easy to imagine future of the Jewish State.
Well… despite so many incidents that are happening in less than a decade and making the situation more and more grave, IT won’t happen during the lifetime of Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On. I am still curious… what has been her real reason? A real heart toward her Palestinian petitioner (singular) or her professional desire?
No matter what, time will pass and IT will happen, to be sure… according to what I read. Then, not Bibi’s Big-Mouth but Palestinian-Heart of Meretz MK will be remembered as what actually caused Self-Destruction of the Jewish State. I promise… What if I write a book, in which I explain all the details about ‘Who’s Whose Who,’ and introduce Bibi as a starter and Gal-On as a mere-joiner?
From Bibi: PM Netanyahu will resume West Bank Settlement Activity (Sep 29, 2008).
Netanyahu vows to expand settlements if elected PM (Oct 1, 2008): (…) While the Left warned that Netanyahu would outrage the international community and prevent an agreement with the Palestinians, the Right doubted he was telling the truth. (…)
Who is worrying what? And WHY? Anyway, I will make Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann the most famous figure in the international community. So… whatever you do… I wish you GOOD LUCK! By the way, when is Female Justice Dalia Dorner, the president of Israel Press Council going to take care of my Human Rights?
From P.P.S.: Beinisch’s Secret Society Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann
Dalia Dorner: Former Judge & Israel Press Council’s President (Beinisch Can’t Accept Olmert/Friedmann)
(…click Cancer-Dorit-Beinisch to read the entire text…)
5
